(Family Features) Preserving your community for future generations can take many forms. It might mean volunteering with local organizations and participating in community improvement initiatives. Taking steps to protect the environment is another critical way to ensure your community remains safe and livable for generations to come.

These ideas show that going green can be as simple as making small modifications to everyday actions you already take.

Donating Unwanted Goods
Landfills are overflowing with items that still have plenty of useful life. Often, those discarded items could be repurposed to provide an affordable option to those who can’t afford new, full-price versions. Before loading up your trash can, consider donating things like household goods and clothing that could still serve a purpose. Numerous organizations accept gently used goods that they either distribute directly to those in need or sell to the general public, with proceeds benefiting a specific cause or population. Look into the options in your area to find the best fit for items you have that can be donated.

Rethinking Transportation
Pollution from transportation accounts for 29% of the United States’ emissions, according to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). That’s a higher percentage than any other category measured by the EPA. Carpooling, public transportation and even carefully planning your route are ways you can take personal accountability to help reduce the problem.

Another way to improve transportation emissions is by talking to your school district about its school bus choices. Diesel school buses are not only expensive to operate, but they are harmful to children’s health, the community and the climate, according to data compiled by the Propane Education & Research Council. Conversely, propane reduces harmful emissions that impact student health and air quality in the community. By advocating for your district to convert to a more environmentally friendly transportation option, such as propane, you can help further reduce harmful emissions in your community.

Find more information about propane-powered buses at BetterOurBuses.com.

Recycling and Composting
Another way to reduce landfill waste is recycling and composting. Many of the items you throw away can be recycled into all-new materials. For example, recycled plastic can be used in a wide range of products, from sleeping bags and backpacks to dishes and reusable water bottles. Food waste represents a large share of landfills, too. Eventually it will biodegrade, but composting what you can at home gives you nutrient-rich material you can use to support your garden or lawn with healthier soil and less need for pesticides.

Cleaning with Natural Products
Keeping your home clean takes more than a little elbow grease, but the harsh chemicals found in many household cleaners are actually quite damaging. The chemicals can be poisonous or contain allergens that negatively impact your home’s air quality. Natural cleaners are often more cost-efficient, so you can enjoy cleaner air and minimize your impact on the environment.

Taking Advantage of Natural Light
If you’re in the habit of flipping on a light switch as you walk in a room, next time pause and consider whether you really need additional light. During daylight hours, many rooms offer more than enough natural light. Sunlight can also help warm spaces naturally when it’s cool outdoors, so throw open the curtains and let those warm, bright rays shine. If you do need additional light, consider relying on task lighting to illuminate your project rather than an overhead light that consumes more electricity.

Benefits of Propane School Buses

Over the last several decades, there have been many advances in student transportation. However, one area that could still use improvement is the number of students who ride to school on diesel buses that pollute the air. Today, there are two meaningful energy choices for clean student transportation: propane and electric. While both can achieve clean transportation, propane buses cost one-third the price of electric, allowing districts to replace their aging diesel fleet faster.

As an affordable, available and clean energy source, propane buses make practical sense. The buses reduce harmful emissions by 96% compared to diesel. They can also meet school districts’ needs with a range of up to 400 miles and the resiliency to continue operating across all terrains and in any weather. In fact, more than 1,000 school districts have already made the switch. Every day, 1.3 million children ride to school in 22,000 propane school buses across the country.

In 2022, the EPA introduced the Clean School Bus Program, which provides $5 billion over five years (2022-26) to replace existing diesel school buses with zero-emission and low-emission models.

Through three rounds of funding, the EPA program has allocated more than $2.8 billion for 8,427 electric school buses and 440 low-emissions propane buses. However, for the same amount of money that was distributed for the electric buses (about $2.77 billion), the program could have helped fund as many as 92,635 propane buses, assuming each propane bus received the $30,000 incentive.

When considering full lifecycle emissions, replacing 92,635 diesel buses with propane buses would have reduced harmful nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions by 24,664 metric tons over the three years the program has funded buses. By comparison, replacing just 8,427 diesel buses with electric buses will reduce NOx emissions by just 2,379 metric tons over the three years.

SOURCE:
Propane Education & Research Council

The Bridge is a section of the STM Daily News Blog meant for diversity, offering real news stories about bona fide community efforts to perpetuate a greater good. The purpose of The Bridge is to connect the divides that separate us, fostering understanding and empathy among different groups. By highlighting positive initiatives and inspirational actions, The Bridge aims to create a sense of unity and shared purpose. This section brings to light stories of individuals and organizations working tirelessly to promote inclusivity, equality, and mutual respect. Through these narratives, readers are encouraged to appreciate the richness of diverse perspectives and to participate actively in building stronger, more cohesive communities.

https://stmdailynews.com/category/the-bridge

In the world of inventions and innovations, recognition often eludes unsung heroes whose contributions shape our daily lives. One such hero, Philip B. Downing, an African American inventor, made a significant impact on the postal system with his innovative version of the U.S. postal mailbox. Though often overlooked, Downing’s inventions have left a lasting legacy on the way we handle and protect our mail. Let’s take a closer look at his life and achievements, while addressing misconceptions surrounding other names in the history of the street mailbox.

The Life and Inventions of Philip B. Downing:

Born in Providence, Rhode Island, in 1857, Philip B. Downing faced numerous challenges and societal barriers as an African American inventor in the late 19th century. However, his determination and ingenuity propelled him forward.

While Downing is best known for his contribution to the development of the street railway switch, his impact on the postal system is equally significant. In 1891, he patented his version of the U.S. postal mailbox, incorporating an anti-tampering feature. This innovative design protected mail from the elements and tampering, ensuring its safe delivery. Downing’s other patents included an envelope moistener and a user-friendly desktop notepad.

The Legacy of Philip B. Downing:

Despite his notable inventions and their impact on the postal system during his time, Philip B. Downing’s name has been overshadowed by other inventors who were involved in the development of the mailbox. However, it is essential to recognize the contributions of all parties while ensuring historical accuracy.

Addressing Misconceptions:

Some mentions have been made of individuals such as JH VanDoran, but the evidence for their involvement in the development of the mailbox is scarce or nonexistent. On the other hand, the Van Dorn Iron Works Company of Cleveland, Ohio, played a crucial role in manufacturing collection boxes for the Post Office Department. It is worth acknowledging the contributions of all involved parties while setting the record straight.

Philip B. Downing’s contributions as an inventor serve as an inspiring example of resilience and determination. His revolutionary designs in the postal system not only enhanced efficiency but also ensured the security of mail delivery. Downing’s remarkable achievements, often overshadowed by others, deserve recognition and remembrance. As we celebrate Moments in History, it is important to shine a light on the overlooked heroes like Philip B. Downing, whose work shapes our world today. Let us honor their legacies as we continue to aspire, innovate, and shape the future.

Sources:

National Postal Museum

– “Vanishing Americana: Lamp Post Letter Boxes” by James H. Bruns and Michael J. Lilly.

Philip B. Downing – United States Patent Office

https://patents.google.com/patent/US462093A/en

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_B._Downing

The Bridge is a section of the STM Daily News Blog meant for diversity, offering real news stories about bona fide community efforts to perpetuate a greater good. The purpose of The Bridge is to connect the divides that separate us, fostering understanding and empathy among different groups. By highlighting positive initiatives and inspirational actions, The Bridge aims to create a sense of unity and shared purpose. This section brings to light stories of individuals and organizations working tirelessly to promote inclusivity, equality, and mutual respect. Through these narratives, readers are encouraged to appreciate the richness of diverse perspectives and to participate actively in building stronger, more cohesive communities.

https://stmdailynews.com/category/the-bridge

Gilbert, Arizona

In a surprising move, the Town of Gilbert has introduced a controversial Community Preservation Ordinance aimed at maintaining cleanliness in residents’ front and backyards. This ordinance grants the town council the authority to issue fines of up to $500 for violations such as dead grass, debris accumulation, and non-functional vehicles on properties.

However, this decision has sparked significant backlash among Gilbert residents who argue that the ordinance infringes upon their constitutional rights, specifically the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The community members emphasize that the ordinance grants the town intrusive powers to inspect and penalize based on subjective standards of cleanliness, raising concerns about privacy and government overreach.

Many residents have voiced their displeasure at town meetings, through social media, and in local news outlets. They argue that the ordinance is not only an overreach of governmental powers but also an unnecessary burden on homeowners who may already be struggling with financial or health issues that prevent them from maintaining their properties to the town’s standards. Others worry that such fines could disproportionately affect elderly or disabled residents who might not have the means or physical capability to comply with the ordinance.

In addition to concerns over privacy and financial strain, some residents feel that the ordinance is too ambiguously worded, leaving too much room for subjective interpretation by enforcement officers. This ambiguity, they argue, could lead to inconsistent application of the rules and potential favoritism or bias.

On the other hand, supporters of the ordinance argue that it is essential for maintaining the town’s aesthetic appeal and property values. They believe that well-maintained front and backyards contribute to the overall quality of life in the community and prevent the decline of neighborhoods. Some supporters also suggest that the ordinance could encourage residents to take greater pride in their homes and surroundings, fostering a sense of community and mutual respect.

Despite the controversy, the town council has moved forward with implementing the ordinance, pledging to review its impact and make adjustments as necessary. They have also promised to take residents’ concerns into account by creating a transparent process for reporting and addressing violations, as well as offering assistance programs for those who may need help mowing their lawns or removing debris.

As the Town of Gilbert navigates this contentious issue, it remains to be seen how the Community Preservation Ordinance will affect the community in the long term. Will it lead to a cleaner, more vibrant town as intended, or will it create further divisions and resentment among residents who feel their rights are being trampled? Only time will tell.

Discover the 12news article: ‘Violation of the Fourth Amendment’: Gilbert residents challenge an ordinance allowing the town to issue citations for backyard clutter

As author Chase Golightly delves into this contentious issue, it becomes clear that Gilbert residents are not willing to compromise their rights in the name of neighborhood aesthetics. The debate over the balance between property upkeep and individual liberties is intensifying, with residents voicing their discontent and pushing back against what they perceive as an overreach of government authority.

Residents have organized town hall meetings and formed advocacy groups to rally against the ordinance, emphasizing that their constitutional rights should not be sacrificed for the sake of uniformity in the appearance of their homes. Many argue that the government’s regulations infringe upon their Fourth Amendment rights, which protect against unreasonable searches and seizures. Homeowners assert that they should have the autonomy to decide how to maintain their properties without undue interference.

The local government, on the other hand, maintains that the ordinance is necessary to preserve property values and ensure that the community remains attractive and well-maintained. They argue that the ordinance benefits all residents by preventing the deterioration of neighborhood standards, which can lead to declining property values and increased crime rates. The officials insist that they are acting within their legal rights to enforce the regulations and that they have taken steps to accommodate residents’ concerns by providing exemptions and a grace period for compliance.

As the tension between the residents and the government escalates, the situation in Gilbert has garnered attention beyond the town’s borders. Legal experts and civil rights organizations have begun to weigh in on the issue, examining the potential repercussions of the ordinance and its enforcement. This has sparked a broader conversation about the limits of governmental power and the importance of protecting individual freedoms in the face of community standards.

Stay tuned as the town of Gilbert navigates through this dilemma of community standards versus constitutional rights, and as residents continue to advocate for their freedoms in the face of the ordinance’s enforcement. The outcome of this debate could set a significant precedent for similar disputes in communities across the nation. #GilbertCommunityPreservation #FourthAmendmentConcerns #ResidentAdvocacy

https://stmdailynews.com/category/stories-this-moment