Last Updated on December 16, 2025 by Daily News Staff

Director Rob Reiner participates in a discussion following a screening of the film LBJ at the LBJ Presidential Library in Austin, Texas on Saturday October 22, 2016
On Saturday evening October 22, 2016, the LBJ Presidential Library held a sneak peek of Rob Reiner’s new filmÊLBJ, starring Woody Harrelson as the 36th president. The film, which premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival in September, chronicles the life and times of Lyndon Johnson who would inherit the presidency at one of the most fraught moments in American history.
Following the screening, director Rob Reiner, actor Woody Harrelson, and writer Joey Hartstone joined LBJ Library Director Mark Updegrove on stage for a conversation about the film.
LBJ Library photo by Jay Godwin
10/22/2016

Hollywood Legend Rob Reiner and Wife Found Dead; Son in Custody

December 15, 2025

Renowned filmmaker and actor Rob Reiner, 78, and his wife Michele Singer Reiner, 68, were found dead in their Brentwood, Los Angeles home on Sunday, authorities say. Emergency responders were called to the residence Sunday afternoon, where both were discovered with fatal wounds consistent with a stabbing. Police are treating the case as a double homicide. 

Los Angeles police arrested the couple’s 32-year-old son, Nick Reiner, in connection with the deaths. He is being held in custody as investigators continue to piece together the circumstances surrounding the incident. 

2016 SAMHSA Voice Awards

Reiner was one of Hollywood’s most influential figures, known for his work as a director, producer and actor. His career spanned decades, from early television fame to directing beloved films that shaped American cinema. 

Friends, colleagues and public figures have begun sharing tributes and reactions to the news as the investigation is ongoing. 

More details will be updated as they become available.

The Inspiring Legacy of Raymond E. Fowler: A Journey into the Unknown

Last Updated on December 3, 2025 by Daily News Staff

DoorDash delivery driver involved in a viral video controversy after claiming sexual assault; police say no assault occurred, and the driver now faces felony charges.

DoorDash Driver Arrested After Claiming Sexual Assault: What Really Happened?

A Viral Accusation Turns Into a Criminal Case

A routine food drop-off turned into a national controversy this month after a DoorDash delivery driver claimed she was sexually assaulted during a delivery — only to later be arrested herself following a police investigation. The incident, which quickly spread across TikTok and other platforms, has generated fierce debate over privacy, personal safety, and the power of viral video culture.

The driver, identified as Livie Rose Henderson, posted a video on social media in mid-October claiming that when she arrived at a customer’s home in Oswego, New York, she found the front door open and discovered a man “half-naked and unconscious” on his couch. She publicly described the moment as a sexual assault, saying she felt endangered and traumatized.

Her posts went viral almost immediately, drawing attention from millions of viewers and sparking outrage over the safety risks faced by gig workers — particularly women — who make deliveries to unfamiliar homes.

But the narrative took a dramatic turn.

Police: No Sexual Assault Occurred

According to the Oswego Police Department, an investigation found no evidence that Henderson was sexually assaulted. Instead, authorities say that she:

• Entered the home without consent

• Recorded the unconscious customer, who was partially nude

• Posted the footage online, identifying him

• Made claims police say were “false and misleading”

Investigators concluded the man was intoxicated and unconscious, not acting with intent or awareness. As a result, Henderson was arrested and charged with:

• Second-degree unlawful surveillance (felony)

• First-degree dissemination of unlawful surveillance images (felony)

Police emphasized that recording a person who is nude or partially nude inside their home — regardless of context — constitutes a violation of New York’s surveillance and privacy laws if done without permission.

DoorDash Drops the Driver

Henderson also claimed that DoorDash deactivated her account, something she described as retaliation for “exposing her assaulter.” But following her arrest, DoorDash stated that recording customers inside their homes violates company policy and local laws.

DoorDash said it cooperated with investigators but declined to comment further on personnel matters.

A Complicated Public Reaction

Social media reaction has been sharply divided:

Advertisement

Sympathy for the driver

Many viewers initially supported Henderson, arguing that gig workers often deal with unsafe conditions and should not be forced to decide between finishing a delivery or backing away from a potentially threatening situation.

Backlash over privacy violations

Others argue that Henderson crossed legal and ethical boundaries by:

• Entering a private residence

• Recording a vulnerable, unconscious person

• Posting it publicly

• Accusing the individual of a crime without evidence

These actions, critics say, show the dangerous consequences of rushing to social media before police or professional investigators evaluate the facts.

The Larger Issue: Safety vs. Responsibility

This case highlights a broader tension in the era of app-based work and viral content:

• Gig workers do indeed face unpredictable and sometimes unsafe situations.

• Customers have a right to privacy in their homes.

• Social media, meanwhile, rewards the fastest and most dramatic version of a story — even before the truth is known.

As the criminal process continues, Henderson’s case may set a new precedent for how privacy laws interact with the realities of delivery work and the instant visibility of online platforms.

Further Reading

• DoorDash driver fired for sharing video of customer, claims sexual assault – Newsweek

  Covers the viral video incident and how the driver’s DoorDash account was deactivated after she claimed sexual assault.

• DoorDash Driver Allegedly Posted TikTok Video of Naked Sleeping Customer – Now She’s Under Arrest – People

  Details the police investigation and the subsequent charges filed against the driver.

• The Viral ‘DoorDash Girl’ Saga Unearthed a Nightmare for Black Creators – Wired

  Analyzes the social media fallout, the viral spread of the video, and the broader implications for gig workers and online creators.

• What Happened with Livie Rose Henderson? Fired DoorDash Driver’s Account of Alleged SA Goes Viral – Primetimer

  Breaks down the conflicting narratives and public reactions to Henderson’s claims and the viral video.

• DoorDash driver charged after recording, posting video of nude customer – WBTV

  Official police statement on the investigation and the charges against Henderson.

  Advertisement

  

• Doordasher arrested over TikTok of half-naked customer – Law Enforcement Today

  Focuses on the legal perspective, privacy violations, and the potential consequences of posting sensitive content online.

STM Daily News is a vibrant news blog dedicated to sharing the brighter side of human experiences. Emphasizing positive, uplifting stories, the site focuses on delivering inspiring, informative, and well-researched content. With a commitment to accurate, fair, and responsible journalism, STM Daily News aims to foster a community of readers passionate about positive change and engaged in meaningful conversations. Join the movement and explore stories that celebrate the positive impacts shaping our world.

https://stmdailynews.com/

Last Updated on November 10, 2025 by Daily News Staff

Senate Advances Deal to End Shutdown as ACA Subsidy Debate Intensifies

The recent vote in the Senate to advance a stop-gap spending bill to reopen the government marks a turning point — but also a source of deep tension within the Democratic Party. Eight Senate Democrats broke with their caucus and joined Republicans, enabling the legislation to move forward. Their defection has prompted progressive backlash and raised bigger questions about the fate of ACA premium tax-credits, and whether new leadership in the Democratic Senate ranks is imminent.

The Vote That Shook the Caucus

On November 9–10, 2025, the Senate advanced a funding measure that would end the longest federal shutdown in U.S. history. Eight Democrats (and one independent who caucuses with Democrats) voted with Republicans to get to the 60-vote threshold required under Senate rules. 

Those lawmakers include:

• Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev)

• Dick Durbin (D-Ill)

• John Fetterman (D-Pa)

• Maggie Hassan (D-N.H)

• Tim Kaine (D-Va)

• Angus King (I-Me)

• Jacky Rosen (D-Nev)

• Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H) 

Their main justification: the shutdown was inflicting too much damage on federal workers, food-aid recipients, and other Americans, and this was the best viable route to reopening the government. 

Progressive Outrage and Leadership Questions

Progressive Democrats didn’t buy the justification. They argue that by voting to reopen the government without securing a guaranteed extension of the ACA subsidies, these eight senators essentially abandoned a major Democratic policy fight. Many called it a betrayal of working-class Americans who depend on those subsidies. 

The vote has also triggered renewed calls for a shake-up in Democratic Senate leadership. Critics of Chuck Schumer argue that under his leadership the party lacked leverage and strategic clarity, allowing moderate-leaning Democrats to break away. Some are publicly saying: if the leader cannot deliver on major priorities like healthcare, why continue in position? 

What This Means for the ACA Subsidies

The subsidies at stake are premium tax credits under the ACA that help millions of Americans afford health insurance. With those credits set to expire at the end of the year, the question becomes: will the government extend them, and if so under what terms?

Here are key points:

• The deal that ended the shutdown did not include the guaranteed extension of those subsidies. Instead, it included only a promise of a vote later (in December) to address the subsidy extension. 

• That promise is weak in the eyes of many Democrats. There is no guarantee the vote will pass in December — Republicans oppose extension without major reforms, and it isn’t clear whether the House will follow. 

• If the subsidies are not extended, millions of Americans could see their insurance premiums rise significantly for 2026 — a politically explosive outcome especially for the Democrats heading into mid-terms. 

• On the flip side, if Democrats regain stronger negotiating power or leadership changes, there may still be hope for a more robust extension or even permanent fix — but that is uncertain and depends on internal party cohesion and bargaining leverage.

The Bigger Picture & Stakes Ahead

The broadcast-surface story is the shutdown. But below the surface are several consequential dynamics:

• The eight senators’ decision signals that moderate members of the party are willing to prioritize ending the shutdown rather than extract full concessions on healthcare. That may embolden similar splits in other policy fights.

• Progressive momentum within the party is rising — their anger over the subsidy gambit may feed leadership change, a firmer stance in 2026 campaigns, and internal challenges to the old guard.

• For consumers and voters, the health-insurance premium question is no abstraction: if subsidies lapse, premiums will spike, especially for moderate-income households. That economic pain can shift electoral dynamics.

• For the Democrats’ larger messaging, the risk is an identity crisis: if the party is seen as backing away from core promises (like healthcare affordability), it may affect voter trust and turnout.

• For the policy, even if a vote occurs in December, the fix may be short-term rather than long-term, which leaves the cycle vulnerable to future cliffs unless structural reforms are enacted.

The Wrap Up (For now)

In short: the shutdown deal unlocked relief in the short run, but at the potential cost of longer-term healthcare policy gains. The eight Democrats who crossed the line may be lauded by some for pragmatism, but criticized by many for ceding leverage and failing to protect vital subsidies. Meanwhile, the fight over who leads the party and how bold it remains in 2026 is very much alive.

Advertisement

With the December vote looming, all eyes will be on whether the promise of action on ACA premium credits turns into a reality — or whether the surprise leadership shifts and policy limbo become the new status quo.

Sources

• TIME – “The Eight Senators Who Broke With Democrats to End the Government Shutdown.”

• Politico – “The Eight Senate Democratic Caucus Members Who Voted to End the Shutdown.”

• Fox Baltimore – “Stopgap Deal Signals End to Shutdown but Renews Divisions Among Democrats.”

• WYFF4 News – “Senate Reaches Deal to Extend Government Funding.”

• Yahoo News – “Shutdown Deal Pits Democrats’ Moderates Against Progressives on ACA Subsidies.”

• The Guardian – “Republicans Reject Democrats’ Proposal to End Longest Shutdown in U.S. History.”

STM Daily News will continue monitoring developments related to the Senate’s shutdown deal, Affordable Care Act subsidy discussions, and any forthcoming leadership responses. Updates will be added as new details emerge.

STM Daily News is a vibrant news blog dedicated to sharing the brighter side of human experiences. Emphasizing positive, uplifting stories, the site focuses on delivering inspiring, informative, and well-researched content. With a commitment to accurate, fair, and responsible journalism, STM Daily News aims to foster a community of readers passionate about positive change and engaged in meaningful conversations. Join the movement and explore stories that celebrate the positive impacts shaping our world.

https://stmdailynews.com/