Connect with us

Economy

Fed rate cut is attempt to prevent recession without sending prices soaring

Published

on

Fed rate cut
The Fed’s job can seem like a balancing act.
Dimitri Otis/DigitalVision via Getty Images

Fed rate cut is attempt to prevent recession without sending prices soaring

Ryan Herzog, Gonzaga University

The Federal Reserve on Sept. 17, 2025, cut its target interest rate as it shifts focus from fighting inflation to supporting the choppy labor market.

As financial markets expected, the Fed lowered rates a quarter point to a range of 4% to 4.25%, its first cut since December 2024.

The Fed’s decision to begin cutting rates comes as evidence mounts that the U.S. labor market is losing momentum. The headline unemployment rate has stayed steady at near record lows, but the underlying trends are more concerning.

At the same time, the fight against inflation is not over yet. While a cooling jobs market could lead to a recession, cutting rates too much could drive inflation higher.

So if you’re the Fed, what do you do?

I’m an economist who tracks labor market data and monetary policy, examining how changes in hiring, wages and unemployment influence the Federal Reserve’s efforts to steer the economy. There’s an incredibly large amount of data the Fed, investors, economists like me and many others use to understand the state of the economy – and much of it often tells conflicting stories.

Here are some the data points I’ve been following most closely to better understand where the U.S. economy might go from here – and the tough choices the Fed has to make.

a bespectacled white man in a suit stands before a podium with a micrphone
Fed Chairman Jerome Powell speaks during a news conference after the rate-cut decision.
AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

Underlying trouble in the labor market

The labor market looks stable on the surface, but more granular data tells a different story.

The unemployment rate has remained close to historic lows at 4.3% as of August 2025, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

But the number of long-term unemployed – people out of work for 27 weeks or longer – rose to 1.9 million in August, up 385,000 from a year earlier. These workers now make up 25.7% of all unemployed people, the highest share since February 2022. Persistent long-term joblessness often signals deeper cracks forming in the labor market.

At the same time, new claims for unemployment benefits are spiking. Initial claims for unemployment insurance – a leading indicator of labor market stress – jumped by 27,000 to 263,000 for the week ending Sept. 6, according to the U.S. Department of Labor. That’s the sharpest increase in months and well above economists’ forecasts. It suggests layoffs are becoming more common.

Advertisement
Get More From A Face Cleanser And Spa-like Massage

We also got news that past payroll growth was overstated. In a process the Bureau of Labor Statistics undertakes annually to double-check its data, the bureau recently revised its jobs data downward from April 2024 through March 2025 by 911,000. In other words, the economy created roughly 75,000 fewer jobs per month than previously reported. This implies the labor market was weaker than it appeared all along.

Finally, workers are losing confidence. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York reported in August that the confidence of people who lost their jobs in finding another fell to its lowest level – 44.9% – since it started surveying consumers in June 2013. That’s another sign workers are feeling less secure about their prospects.

Taken together, these data points paint a clear picture: The labor market is not collapsing, but it is softening. That helps explain why the Fed is beginning to cut rates now – hoping to stimulate spending – before the job market breaks more sharply.

packages of bacon and other meat are on display in a grocery store
Prices of meat and other groceries have been on the rise recently.
Scott Olson/Getty Images

Tariffs are complicating the inflation data

Even as the labor market softens, tariffs are pushing certain prices higher than they otherwise would be, complicating the Federal Reserve’s effort to bring inflation down.

Government data shows that businesses have begun passing the costs of President Donald Trump’s new import tariffs to consumers. In August, clothing prices rose 0.5% and grocery prices rose 0.6%, with especially strong gains for tariff-sensitive items such as coffee.

Lower-income households are getting hit hardest because they spend more of their budget on imported goods, which tend to be the lower-cost items most affected by tariffs. A report from the Yale Budget Lab found that core goods prices are about 1.9% above pre-2025 trends as tariffs raise costs for basic items such as appliances and electronics.

Phillip Swagel, director of the Congressional Budget Office, said recently that Trump’s tariffs have pushed inflation higher than CBO analysts had expected, even as overall economic activity has weakened since January.

Typically, a slowdown in the labor market is met with slower inflation. But while the CBO now projects that the tariffs will reduce the federal budget deficit by about US$4 trillion over the next decade – roughly $3.3 trillion in new revenue and $700 billion in lower debt service costs – but it will come at the cost of near-term upward pressure on prices.

This creates a difficult balancing act for the Fed: Cut rates too quickly, and tariff-driven price pressures could reignite inflation; move too slowly, and the softening labor market could tip into recession.

a bespectacled white man in a vest look on as a tv screen shows news of fed rate cut behind him
Traders react to the Fed news.
AP Photo/Richard Drew

A narrow path to a soft landing

As it resumes cutting rates, the Federal Reserve is trying to thread a narrow needle – easing policy enough to keep the labor market from cracking while not reigniting inflation, which is proving stickier in part because of tariffs.

Markets are betting the Fed will keep cutting. The futures market is betting the Fed will cut rates by another half point by the end of the year. And the one-year Treasury yield has dropped about 150 basis points (1.5%) since June, signaling that investors expect a series of rate cuts through 2025 and into 2026.

At its latest meeting, the Fed signaled two more rate cuts in 2025 and at least one rate cut in 2026.

Advertisement
Get More From A Face Cleanser And Spa-like Massage

Such cuts would ultimately bring the federal funds rate closer to 3% and hopefully reduce 30-year mortgage rates to around 5% – from an average of 6.35% as of Sept. 11. If the labor market continues to weaken – with jobless claims climbing, payrolls revised down and more workers stuck in long-term unemployment – that expectation will likely harden into consensus.

But the path is far from certain. Cutting rates too quickly could cause inflation to spike, while going too slow could lead to further deterioration in the labor market. Either outcome would jeopardize the Fed’s credibility – whether by appearing unable to control prices or by allowing unemployment to rise unnecessarily. That would undermine its ability to influence markets and enforce its dual mandate of maximum employment and stable prices.

Another tricky issue is Trump’s public campaign to push the Fed to cut rates – appearing to do his bidding could also undercut Fed credibility. For what it’s worth, the Sept. 17 rate cut appears driven less by politics than by economic data. The Fed itself was projecting a year ago that rates would be much lower today than they actually are, suggesting it’s been following the data.

The economy appears to be slowing but remains resilient, which is why the Fed is likely to move gradually. The risk is that the window for a soft landing is closing. The coming months will determine whether the Fed can ease early enough to avoid recession, or whether it has already waited too long.

Ryan Herzog, Associate Professor of Economics, Gonzaga University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading
Advertisement SodaStream USA, inc

The Knowledge

Where Does Federal Money Go? The Biggest Costs Behind the Budget

Where does federal money go? Part two of our National Debt Explained series examines the biggest expenses in the 2025 budget and how spending connects to government borrowing.

Published

on

Last Updated on October 13, 2026 by Daily News Staff

The Knowledge | National Debt Explained, Part 2

When discussing debt, ask: Who borrowed the money? That question helps distinguish a family’s finances from the federal budget. Our first episode explained why your credit card balance is separate from the national debt. Now comes the next question: What does the federal government spend money on?

U.S. Capitol surrounded by illustrations representing Social Security, health care, defense, infrastructure, and interest on federal debt.
An editorial illustration places the U.S. Capitol at the center, surrounded by scenes representing Social Security, health care, defense, infrastructure, and interest on federal debt. Retirement and health care receive the greatest visual emphasis, highlighting major expenses explored in The Knowledge’s national debt series.

Much of it pays for retirement benefits, health coverage, national defense, public services, and interest on previous borrowing.

Social Security was the largest individual program in fiscal year 2025, costing approximately $1.6 trillion. But combine the major health care programs—including Medicare, Medicaid, and health insurance subsidies—and their spending reached about $1.8 trillion, exceeding Social Security alone. cbo.gov

Part one in the series of articles about the national debt> https://stmdailynews.com/whose-debt-is-the-national-debt/

The figures below cover October 1, 2024, through September 30, 2025.

Major expenseFY 2025 spendingWhat it supports
Social SecurityAbout $1.6 trillionRetirement, survivor, and disability benefits
Medicare, net$988 billionHealth coverage for older adults and certain people with disabilities
Net interest$970 billionCost of servicing publicly held federal debt, after subtracting interest income
Discretionary defense$893 billionMilitary personnel, operations, equipment, and research
Medicaid$668 billionFederal contribution toward health coverage and care for eligible people

These are selected expenses, not the entire budget. Medicare spending is shown after premiums and other offsetting receipts. The combined health care total already includes Medicare and Medicaid, so it should not be added to those rows. cbo.gov

The government also supports veterans’ health care, transportation, education, housing assistance, courts, law enforcement, scientific research, disaster response, and environmental protection. Nondefense discretionary spending totaled approximately $980 billion in 2025, covering many of these services. Some funding for these areas falls elsewhere in the budget. cbo.gov

Federal spending falls into three broad groups:

  • Mandatory spending: Payments governed by existing eligibility rules and benefit formulas, including Social Security and major health programs.
  • Discretionary spending: Funding lawmakers control through appropriations legislation, including most defense spending and many public services.
  • Net interest: The expense of servicing publicly held federal debt, minus government interest income. cbo.gov

Interest deserves attention because it pays for borrowing already undertaken. In 2025, net interest exceeded discretionary defense spending. Congressional Budget Office

A program’s cost does not automatically translate into an equal increase in national debt. Taxes and other receipts finance much of federal spending. Social Security and Medicare’s hospital insurance program receive dedicated payroll taxes, while Medicare also collects premiums.

In 2025, federal spending totaled approximately $7 trillion, compared with $5.2 trillion in revenue. The roughly $1.8 trillion shortfall was the deficit, requiring borrowing. Understanding national debt therefore means examining both what government spends and what it collects. cbo.gov

Explore more explanations behind the headlines at STM Daily News, home of The Knowledge.

Advertisement
Get More From A Face Cleanser And Spa-like Massage

Sources for this episode

Related reading

Continue Reading

Daily News

Whose Debt Is the National Debt?

The national debt isn’t Americans’ credit card balances added together. This simple explainer separates federal borrowing from household debt and explains the difference between debt and a deficit.

Published

on

Last Updated on October 11, 2026 by Daily News Staff

The Knowledge | STM Daily News

National Debt: Split illustration showing the U.S. Capitol and Treasury documents beside a household credit card, calculator, and bills, contrasting national and personal debt.
An editorial illustration contrasts federal borrowing with household debt. On one side, the U.S. Capitol, Treasury documents, and dollar bills represent the national debt. On the other, a credit card, calculator, and bills on a kitchen table represent personal borrowing. A clear divider emphasizes that these are separate types of debt.

When you hear “national debt,” do you picture everyone’s credit card balances added together? The name can create that impression, but the national debt and household debt measure different borrowing.

The U.S. national debt is money the federal government owes. Your personal credit card balance is not included.

Whose Debt Is the National Debt?

Federal debt versus household debt

The Treasury defines national debt as the federal government’s total outstanding borrowing accumulated over the country’s history. Household debt covers borrowing by individuals and families, including mortgages, credit cards, auto loans, and student loans.

|Type of debt  |Who borrowed?           |Examples                                          |
|————–|————————|————————————————–|
|National debt |Federal government      |Outstanding Treasury securities                   |
|Household debt|Individuals and families|Credit cards, mortgages, auto loans, student loans|

Putting a $500 purchase on your credit card increases your personal balance. It does not add $500 to the national debt.

Firefly Gemini Flash

How does the national debt grow?

When federal spending exceeds tax collections and other revenue, the government runs a budget deficit. Treasury sells securities to borrow money to cover the gap.

Consider a simplified, hypothetical example: the government collects $5 trillion and spends $6 trillion in one year. That leaves a $1 trillion deficit requiring financing.

A deficit measures a shortfall over a period, usually a year. Debt measures outstanding borrowing accumulated over time. Repeated deficits generally increase that debt. Interest on existing borrowing is also a federal expense.

Advertisement
Get More From A Face Cleanser And Spa-like Massage

Does paying off your credit card reduce the national debt?

Paying off a card reduces what you owe your lender. It does not directly repay Treasury borrowing. Household debt and government debt can influence the same economy, but they remain separate obligations.

https://stmdailynews.com/exploring-the-best-neighborhoods-in-downtown-los-angeles/

When discussing debt, ask: Who borrowed the money? That one question helps distinguish a family’s finances from the federal budget.

Find more explanations of the ideas behind the headlines at STM Daily News, home of The Knowledge.

Sources

● U.S. Treasury: Understanding the National Debt

● U.S. Treasury: Understanding the National Deficit

● Federal Reserve Bank of New York: Household Debt and Credit Report

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Paramount Prepares for Possible California Exit Amid Warner Bros. Merger Battle

Published

on

Last Updated on September 17, 2026 by Daily News Staff

HOLLYWOOD, Calif. — Paramount’s century-long connection to Hollywood could be facing one of its biggest challenges yet, as the entertainment giant reportedly prepares for the possibility of moving major operations out of California amid an escalating legal battle over its proposed acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery.

Paramount is reportedly preparing for a possible California exit as its $110 billion Warner Bros. Discovery merger faces an antitrust battle.
Studio weighs California exit amid Warner Bros. merger battle

Paramount has informed the offices of Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and California Attorney General Rob Bonta that it is prepared to formally announce plans to leave California, according to reporting Wednesday from TheWrap. Paramount has not formally announced a relocation, and a company spokesperson declined to comment to the publication.

The potential move centers on Paramount Skydance’s proposed approximately $110 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery, a deal being challenged on antitrust grounds by California and a coalition of 11 other states, along with a separate challenge from the Writers Guild of America. California Attorney General Rob Bonta argues that combining the two entertainment companies could reduce competition, potentially leading to higher prices and fewer choices for consumers.

A court agreement currently prevents Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery from completing the merger until June 1, 2027, or until after a court decision on the states’ claims, whichever comes first. The antitrust case is scheduled for trial in March 2027.

Paramount’s Hollywood Future

At the center of the controversy is Paramount’s historic studio complex at 5555 Melrose Avenue in Hollywood, one of the entertainment industry’s most recognizable properties.

The Los Angeles Times reported that Paramount CEO David Ellison has told associates that he would prefer to remain in Los Angeles. However, Paramount’s board has reportedly approved a contingency plan that could move the company’s headquarters out of Hollywood, and Ellison has indicated that the company is prepared to sell its historic studio properties and relocate operations if the merger remains stalled.

Tennessee, Texas and Georgia have emerged in reports as potential destinations should Paramount ultimately decide to relocate.

The financial pressure is significant. Beginning October 1, Paramount faces a roughly $7 million-per-day additional payment obligation tied to delays in completing the Warner Bros. Discovery transaction. Paramount has asked the federal court to require the states and the Writers Guild of America to post a $1.88 billion bond to cover potential costs associated with the delay.

What’s at Stake for Los Angeles?

A Paramount departure could extend far beyond the loss of a famous Hollywood address.

An economic analysis cited by TheWrap estimates that a large-scale Paramount departure could put as many as 57,980 full-time jobs, $21.2 billion in annual economic output and approximately $1.17 billion in state and local tax revenue at risk. Those figures represent an economic-impact scenario rather than a prediction that all of those losses would necessarily occur.

Advertisement
Get More From A Face Cleanser And Spa-like Massage

There are competing concerns about the merger itself. Los Angeles County analysis has estimated that completing the Paramount-Warner Bros. combination could also eliminate thousands of entertainment and related jobs because of consolidation. Opponents of the merger, including entertainment unions, have raised concerns about reduced competition and employment, while supporters argue that reaching a settlement could help prevent Paramount from moving operations out of California.

Mayor Bass has said she remains focused on protecting Los Angeles entertainment jobs and keeping Hollywood’s entertainment industry centered in the city. Bonta’s office, meanwhile, has maintained that California will continue enforcing its antitrust laws while remaining open to good-faith discussions.

Settlement Talks Scheduled

There is still an opportunity for the dispute to be resolved before Paramount makes a final decision about its California operations.

Paramount Skydance and representatives for California Attorney General Rob Bonta are scheduled to participate in court-ordered settlement talks on October 14 and 15. The discussions could potentially resolve the antitrust dispute and clear a path for Paramount’s proposed Warner Bros. Discovery acquisition.

For now, Paramount has made no official announcement that it is leaving California. The company declined to comment on reports Wednesday that it was preparing to announce a departure.

That leaves the future of Paramount’s Hollywood operations — including its historic Melrose Avenue studio — uncertain as the legal and financial pressure surrounding the merger continues to build.

For now, the gates at Paramount remain firmly planted on Melrose Avenue.

Settlement Talks Scheduled

There is still an opportunity for the dispute to be resolved before Paramount makes a final decision about its California operations.

Paramount Skydance and representatives for California Attorney General Rob Bonta are scheduled to participate in court-ordered settlement talks on October 14 and 15. The discussions could potentially resolve the antitrust dispute and clear a path for Paramount’s proposed Warner Bros. Discovery acquisition.

Advertisement
Get More From A Face Cleanser And Spa-like Massage

For now, Paramount has made no official announcement that it is leaving California. The company declined to comment on reports Wednesday that it was preparing to announce a departure.

That leaves the future of Paramount’s Hollywood operations — including its historic Melrose Avenue studio — uncertain as the legal and financial pressure surrounding the merger continues to build.uilding around the Warner Bros. Discovery deal, the question of whether one of Hollywood’s most historic studios will continue calling California home has moved from speculation to a potentially consequential decision for Los Angeles and its entertainment industry.

STM Daily News will continue monitoring the Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery dispute and what it could mean for Hollywood, entertainment workers and the future of film and television production in California.

Source and Related Reading

Continue Reading

Trending