Connect with us

The Long Track Back

LA City Council Pushes Back Against SB 79: What’s at Stake for Housing Near Transit

The LA City Council narrowly voted to oppose SB 79, a state bill that would allow mid-rise housing near Metro stations and major bus corridors, highlighting the ongoing clash between local control and state-led solutions to Los Angeles’ housing crisis.

Published

on

Last Updated on September 5, 2025 by Daily News Staff

LA SB 79 Housing

Los Angeles, California, USA downtown cityscape at City Hall.

Los Angeles is once again at the center of California’s ongoing housing debate. On August 20, 2025, the LA City Council voted 8–5 to oppose Senate Bill 79 (SB 79), a statewide housing reform bill authored by Senator Scott Wiener. The legislation aims to allow taller housing—up to six or nine stories—near rail stations and major bus corridors, bypassing local zoning restrictions.

The close vote highlights a deep divide within Los Angeles politics: Should the city embrace state-led housing reform to tackle the crisis, or double down on its own local strategies?

What SB 79 Proposes

SB 79 is the latest in a series of bills seeking to override restrictive local zoning in the name of solving California’s housing shortage. Similar to Wiener’s earlier effort, SB 50, the new bill would:

Permit mid-rise housing within ½ mile of rail stations and along major bus rapid transit (BRT) corridors. Require affordability set-asides (20% in some cases). Eliminate single-family zoning near transit hubs to promote denser, transit-oriented development.

For advocates, the bill is common sense: build more homes where people already ride transit. For opponents, it’s another example of Sacramento stripping away local control.

Why the LA City Council Opposed SB 79

The council’s majority, led by members like Traci Park and John Lee, argued that:

Local Control Matters – Neighborhoods and city planners should decide how LA grows, not the state legislature. Infrastructure Costs – City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto warned that more density could strain utilities, services, and transit—costs that could fall on taxpayers. Existing Plans Are Enough – Opponents pointed to LA’s updated housing strategy and Citywide Housing Incentive Program, arguing the city is already on track without state interference.

Mayor Karen Bass endorsed the council’s opposition—though with a twist. She said she could support SB 79 if Los Angeles were exempted, since its housing plan is already state-approved.

The Case for SB 79

On the other side, five councilmembers—including Nithya Raman, Eunisses Hernandez, and Marqueece Harris-Dawson—voted against opposing SB 79. They argued LA’s housing shortage is too severe to rely solely on local action.

“Our actions have not met the moment,” Raman said. “We need bold solutions, even if that means giving up some control.”

Advertisement
Reveal Your Skin's Youthful Radiance with FOREO's LUNA 2 Facial Massager. Shop Now For $199

Housing advocates outside City Hall agree. Groups like California YIMBY and Streets for All say SB 79 is crucial to unlock housing where it’s most needed—near Metro lines and job centers. They warn that LA’s stance signals a retreat to exclusionary zoning, despite one of the worst affordability crises in the nation.

Where SB 79 Would Hit Home

If SB 79 becomes law, the changes would be most visible along Metro rail lines and bus corridors:

Expo / E Line (Santa Monica to DTLA) – Santa Monica, Culver City, USC, Exposition Park Wilshire Corridor (B & D Lines) – Koreatown, Mid-Wilshire, Miracle Mile, Beverly Hills, Westwood (future extension) Crenshaw / K Line – Inglewood, Baldwin Hills, Leimert Park South LA (A Line) – Watts, Florence, Willowbrook, Downtown LA Valley (G Line BRT) – North Hollywood, Van Nuys, Reseda, Canoga Park

That means South LA and East LA could see new development pressures—raising displacement concerns—while affluent areas like Santa Monica, Westwood, and Beverly Hills could face state-mandated density they’ve long resisted.

Why It Matters for LA’s Future

Housing Goals: LA is supposed to plan for ~450,000 new homes by 2029 but is falling far short. Climate Goals: More housing near transit could reduce car dependence and cut emissions. 2028 Olympics: With billions invested in LA Metro, international attention will be on whether LA embraces transit-oriented growth or clings to sprawl.

In many ways, the SB 79 debate isn’t just about housing—it’s about whether California is willing to override local zoning in its largest city to meet statewide goals.

What’s Next

SB 79 has already passed the State Senate and is now moving through the Assembly. Its fate could hinge on whether cities like Los Angeles win exemptions. If it passes without carveouts, LA may be forced to accept taller housing near virtually every Metro station and major transit corridor.

Either way, the fight underscores LA’s crossroads: Will it choose bold, statewide solutions to its housing crisis, or continue to guard local control—even if it means building fewer homes?

✍️ Bottom Line:

The LA City Council’s opposition to SB 79 is a powerful political statement, but it may not stop the bill. Whether LA gets exempted—or whether SB 79 becomes the new housing law of the land—will shape how the city grows for decades to come.

Related Links

Dive into “The Knowledge,” where curiosity meets clarity. This playlist, in collaboration with STMDailyNews.com, is designed for viewers who value historical accuracy and insightful learning. Our short videos, ranging from 30 seconds to a minute and a half, make complex subjects easy to grasp in no time. Covering everything from historical events to contemporary processes and entertainment, “The Knowledge” bridges the past with the present. In a world where information is abundant yet often misused, our series aims to guide you through the noise, preserving vital knowledge and truths that shape our lives today. Perfect for curious minds eager to discover the ‘why’ and ‘how’ of everything around us. Subscribe and join in as we explore the facts that matter.  https://stmdailynews.com/the-knowledge/

Advertisement
Reveal Your Skin's Youthful Radiance with FOREO's LUNA 2 Facial Massager. Shop Now For $199

 

Want more stories 👋
“Your morning jolt of Inspiring & Interesting Stories!”

Sign up to receive awesome articles directly to your inbox.

STM Coffee Newsletter 1

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Dolores Raphael is a dedicated writer and blogger focused on health, fitness, and everyday living. She shares practical tips and inspiring insights to help others lead a balanced and vibrant lifestyle. one of her passions is Pickleball.

The Knowledge

How San Francisco Got Its Cable Cars: The Story Behind an Icon

Published

on

Last Updated on April 4, 2026 by Daily News Staff

Discover the history of San Francisco’s cable cars—from a 19th-century innovation to a preserved national landmark still running today.

Few transportation systems in the world are as instantly recognizable as the cable cars of San Francisco. Climbing steep hills with a steady hum and a nostalgic charm, these moving landmarks are more than just a tourist attraction—they’re a triumph of innovation born out of necessity.

🐎 A Problem on the Hills

In the mid-1800s, San Francisco was growing rapidly, but its geography posed a serious challenge. The city’s steep inclines made travel difficult, especially for horse-drawn streetcars, which were the primary form of public transportation at the time.

Horses often struggled to pull heavy loads uphill, and accidents were common. In some cases, animals collapsed under the strain. This dangerous and inefficient system needed a solution.

💡 The Vision of Andrew Hallidie

That solution came from Andrew Smith Hallidie, an engineer and entrepreneur who envisioned a safer, more reliable way to move people through the city.

Hallidie developed a system in which streetcars would be pulled by a continuously moving cable running beneath the street—eliminating the need for horses altogether.

⚙️ The First Cable Car Line

On August 2, 1873, Hallidie launched the world’s first cable car system: the Clay Street Hill Railroad.

This groundbreaking line proved that cable-powered transit could successfully navigate San Francisco’s steep terrain. Instead of relying on animal power, cars used a mechanical grip to latch onto a moving cable underground, allowing them to glide smoothly up and down hills.

The innovation quickly captured public attention—and demand.

🚀 A City Transformed

Following the success of the Clay Street line, cable car systems spread rapidly across San Francisco.

By the late 19th century:

Advertisement
Reveal Your Skin's Youthful Radiance with FOREO's LUNA 2 Facial Massager. Shop Now For $199
  • Dozens of routes crisscrossed the city
  • Cable cars became the backbone of urban transportation
  • The system helped shape the city’s growth and accessibility

For a time, San Francisco operated the largest and most advanced cable car network in the world.

@stmblog

They didn’t build cable cars for fun… 👀 They built them because horses were dying on San Francisco’s hills. 🚋 The real story is wild https://stmdailynews.com/how-san-francisco-got-its-cable-cars-the-story-behind-an-icon/ NowYouKnow SanFrancisco HistoryTok UrbanHistory DidYouKnow ♬ original sound – STMDailyNews – STMDailyNews

⚡ The Rise of Electric Streetcars

Despite their success, cable cars faced competition from emerging electric streetcar systems in the early 20th century. Electric trolleys were cheaper to build and operate, and they didn’t require the complex underground cable infrastructure.

The turning point came after the devastating 1906 San Francisco earthquake, which destroyed much of the city—including large portions of the cable car network.

When rebuilding began, many lines were converted to electric systems instead of restoring the older cable technology.

The cable cars are now designated as a National Historic Landmark, recognized for their cultural and engineering significance by the National Park Service .

Visitors can explore the history and mechanics of the system at the San Francisco Cable Car Museum , which preserves original equipment and archives.

🛑 Saving a Symbol

By the 1940s, cable cars were on the brink of extinction.

That’s when Friedel Klussmann stepped in. A passionate preservationist, Klussmann led a public campaign to protect the remaining lines from being dismantled.

Her efforts culminated in a successful 1947 voter referendum that ensured the survival of San Francisco’s cable cars—transforming them from everyday transit into a preserved cultural landmark.

🌉 Cable Cars Today

Today, San Francisco’s cable cars are:

Advertisement
Reveal Your Skin's Youthful Radiance with FOREO's LUNA 2 Facial Massager. Shop Now For $199
  • The last manually operated cable car system in the world
  • A National Historic Landmark
  • One of the most visited attractions in California

Three lines remain in operation:

  • Powell–Hyde Line
  • Powell–Mason Line
  • California Street Line

While they still function as public transit, they now serve as a moving museum—connecting modern riders with the city’s past.

🎯 Why It Matters

San Francisco’s cable cars represent more than a mode of transportation. They tell a story of innovation, resilience, and community action.

From solving a practical problem to becoming a global icon, the cable car system reflects how cities adapt—and how people fight to preserve what makes them unique.


📌 “Now You Know”

San Francisco’s cable cars weren’t built for tourism—they were invented to solve a life-and-death problem on steep city streets. Today, they remain the last system of their kind anywhere in the world.

🔗 External Sources & Related Links

Explore the latest in innovation, AI, gadgets, startups, and digital trends in STM Daily News’ Techsection.

Continue Reading

The Knowledge

Why Is It Called Century Boulevard? The Story Behind South Los Angeles’ “100th Street”

Published

on

Century Boulevard in Los Angeles is actually named after its position as 100th Street in the city grid.

LOS ANGELES — Century Boulevard is one of the most recognizable east–west corridors in South Los Angeles, stretching from Watts to Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). But despite its grand-sounding name, the origin of “Century” is surprisingly simple—and rooted in math.

The Meaning Behind “Century”

Century Boulevard sits roughly 100 blocks south of downtown Los Angeles, where the city’s street numbering system begins at 1st Street and Main Street. Instead of naming the road “100th Street,” city planners opted for a more distinctive and memorable name: Century Boulevard.

In this case, “Century” literally means 100.

22E451DC CC5D 4786 8A11 502809AABDD7

Part of Los Angeles’ Grid System

Los Angeles was designed using a grid-based street layout, especially in its expanding southern neighborhoods during the early 20th century. Streets were often named or numbered based on their distance from downtown.

Century Boulevard aligns with what would have been the 100th Street corridor—making it a key reference point in the city’s geography.

A Street That Evolved Over Time

Before it became Century Boulevard, portions of the roadway were known by other names, including Pine Avenue and San Antonio Street. As the region developed and expanded, these segments were unified under a single name in the 1920s.

This consolidation helped streamline navigation and supported growing transportation needs.

lax airport los angeles sign with light colors night timelapse SBI 350771173

From Local Road to Global Gateway

The importance of Century Boulevard grew significantly with the rise of Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). Today, it serves as a major gateway for millions of travelers entering the city.

The road connects diverse communities—from historic neighborhoods in South Los Angeles to the bustling airport corridor—making it both a local lifeline and an international entry point.

More Than Just a Name

Century Boulevard reflects a broader pattern in Los Angeles street naming:

  • Some streets honor historical figures
  • Others reflect geography or culture
  • And some, like Century, are rooted in the city’s structured grid system

It’s a reminder that even the most ordinary street names can reveal deeper stories about how a city was built.

The Bottom Line

Century Boulevard isn’t named after an event—it’s named for its location. Positioned at the 100th Street line, it represents both the logic of Los Angeles’ design and the growth of the city over time.

Now you know.

Related External Links

Dive into “The Knowledge,” where curiosity meets clarity. This playlist, in collaboration with STMDailyNews.com, is designed for viewers who value historical accuracy and insightful learning. Our short videos, ranging from 30 seconds to a minute and a half, make complex subjects easy to grasp in no time. Covering everything from historical events to contemporary processes and entertainment, “The Knowledge” bridges the past with the present. In a world where information is abundant yet often misused, our series aims to guide you through the noise, preserving vital knowledge and truths that shape our lives today. Perfect for curious minds eager to discover the ‘why’ and ‘how’ of everything around us. Subscribe and join in as we explore the facts that matter.  https://stmdailynews.com/the-knowledge/

Advertisement
Reveal Your Skin's Youthful Radiance with FOREO's LUNA 2 Facial Massager. Shop Now For $199
Continue Reading

The Knowledge

Why Phoenix’s Skyline Has Stayed Low — And How It Compares to Los Angeles

Discover why Phoenix’s skyline lacks supertall skyscrapers, from FAA flight path limits near Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport to how it compares with Los Angeles’s skyline growth.

Published

on

Last Updated on March 25, 2026 by Daily News Staff

Discover why Phoenix's skyline lacks supertall skyscrapers, from FAA flight path limits near Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport to how it compares with Los Angeles’s skyline growth.
Tall buildings in downtown Phoenix Arizona

Phoenix is the fifth-largest city in the United States, yet its skyline doesn’t resemble other major metros like Los Angeles, Chicago, or Dallas. Despite rapid population and economic growth, downtown Phoenix has long lacked supertall skyscrapers — and until recently, didn’t even have a building tall enough to qualify as a true “skyscraper” under standard definitions.  

The Basics: Phoenix’s Height Reality

The tallest structure in Phoenix for decades has been Chase Tower, rising to about 483 feet. Under the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat definition, a skyscraper reaches at least 492 feet — which means Phoenix has technically lacked one — despite its size and population.  

@stmblog

Why doesn’t Phoenix have super tall skyscrapers? 🤔🌵 It’s not what you think… ✈️ From FAA flight paths over Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport to the city’s sprawling growth, there’s a hidden reason the skyline stayed low for decades. But that might be changing… 👀🏙️ Phoenix Arizona CityFacts UrbanPlanning Skyline DidYouKnow Infrastructure RealEstate USCities #STMdailynews ♬ original sound – STMDailyNews – STMDailyNews

A new project, the Astra Tower, is planned to rise around 540+ feet when it breaks ground, potentially giving Phoenix its first true skyscraper.  

Airport Proximity: The FAA’s Height Grid

FAA Obstacle Evaluation & Downtown Limits

Phoenix’s skyline constraints are rooted in aviation safety.

📍 Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport sits just a few miles from downtown.

  • The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulates building heights near airports so they don’t obstruct flight paths, require planes to alter approaches, or interfere with climb-out safety.
  • In Phoenix, this results in a layered set of height limits that vary by location and elevation above sea level — often measured in feet above mean sea level (MSL) rather than simply building height from ground.  

The city’s zoning code divides downtown into multiple contour zones with distinct maximum elevation values (e.g., 1,275 ft, 1,525 ft, 1,700 ft MSL), each tied to how close it sits under airport flight paths.  

That means in some blocks you can’t build above a specific elevation even if ground levels are lower — a regulatory “roof” that varies across downtown.

City zoning also explicitly states that no building can exceed the FAA’s airport height limits, even if other bonuses or zoning allowances exist.  


Phoenix vs. Los Angeles: A Quick Comparison

Los Angeles: Higher Limits, Different Constraints

Cities like Los Angeles also have nearby airports (e.g., Los Angeles International Airport), but their key business districts aren’t directly under major flight corridors.

LA’s downtown has:

  • Taller office and residential towers
  • A financial core with dense development
  • Fewer FAA-driven overlays because the flight paths stretch past the downtown edge

Los Angeles’s tallest buildings — including Wilshire Grand Center (~1,100 ft) and U.S. Bank Tower (~1,018 ft) — were built where FAA restrictions don’t force low ceilings. FAA evaluations were conducted but didn’t cut as deeply into downtown zoning compared to Phoenix.

Phoenix, by contrast, sits right under approach and departure corridors — leading to consistent FAA involvement in almost every proposed mid- or high-rise downtown.

Advertisement
Reveal Your Skin's Youthful Radiance with FOREO's LUNA 2 Facial Massager. Shop Now For $199

Economic and Planning Philosophies

Beyond FAA rules:

  • Phoenix developed in the automobile era, with vast inexpensive land encouraging horizontal growth.  
  • Los Angeles grew earlier with heavier investment in centralized neighborhoods and higher density.
  • Phoenix’s village plan long encouraged multiple smaller hubs instead of concentrating all growth in one downtown core.  

These historical differences mean Phoenix didn’t have the same economic “pressure” to build up — even with zoning that allows significant height if FAA permits are met.


What This Means for Phoenix’s Future

Phoenix still has room to grow vertically — but:

  • FAA height contours will remain the ceiling unless flight paths change
  • Developers must secure determinations of no hazard from the FAA before going taller
  • New projects like Astra show demand for taller buildings is rising

As Phoenix’s urban core densifies and land becomes scarcer, its skyline may yet reach higher — but always within the invisible grid drawn by aviation safety.

Related External Links

Dive into “The Knowledge,” where curiosity meets clarity. This playlist, in collaboration with STMDailyNews.com, is designed for viewers who value historical accuracy and insightful learning. Our short videos, ranging from 30 seconds to a minute and a half, make complex subjects easy to grasp in no time. Covering everything from historical events to contemporary processes and entertainment, “The Knowledge” bridges the past with the present. In a world where information is abundant yet often misused, our series aims to guide you through the noise, preserving vital knowledge and truths that shape our lives today. Perfect for curious minds eager to discover the ‘why’ and ‘how’ of everything around us. Subscribe and join in as we explore the facts that matter.  https://stmdailynews.com/the-knowledge/

Continue Reading

Trending