Connect with us

STM Blog

Emergency alerts may not reach those who need them most in Colorado

Published

on

Emergency alerts
A firefighter watches as the NCAR Fire burns on March 26, 2022, in Boulder, Colo. Michael Ciaglo via Getty Images

Emergency alerts may not reach those who need them most in Colorado

Carson MacPherson-Krutsky, University of Colorado Boulder; Mary Angelica Painter, University of Colorado Boulder, and Micki Olson, University at Albany, State University of New York Many Coloradans may never get an alert that could save their life during a disaster. And the alerts that go out may not easily be understood by the people who do get them. We are social scientists who study emergency alerts and warnings, the challenges that exist in getting emergency information to the public, and ways to fix these issues. Research two of us – Carson MacPherson-Krutsky and Mary Painter – did with researcher Melissa Villarreal shows only 4 in 10 Colorado residents have opted in to receive local emergency alerts. And many alerts may not be written with complete information, translated into the languages residents speak, or put into formats accessible to people with vision or hearing loss. This means some of our most vulnerable neighbors could miss crucial information during a crisis.

A decentralized alert system

Alerts are complex. They can come from a variety of official sources, including 911 centers, weather forecast centers and others. Alerts can also come in many forms, ranging from emails and texts to sirens and radio broadcasts. Our study, mandated and funded by Colorado House Bill 23-1237, focused on understanding alert systems in Colorado after the Grizzly Creek Fire in 2020 and the Marshall Fire in 2021.
Smoke billows from a rocky and mountainous forest near an empty highway.
The Grizzly Creek Fire burns down hillsides along I-70 in Glenwood Canyon on Aug. 17, 2020, near Glenwood Springs, Colo. Helen H. Richardson/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images
These fires were destructive and highlighted issues related to emergency alerting. Alerts about the fires and calls to evacuate were delayed and inconsistently received. Most were only available in English despite census data that shows 1 in 10 residents of Eagle and Garfield counties speak Spanish at home and only “speak English less than ‘very well.’” The resulting legislation focused on how to make emergency alerts in Colorado accessible to all, but especially those with disabilities and with limited-English proficiency. As social scientists who study disasters, we know that hazards, like earthquakes and wildfires, reveal inequities and that certain groups fare worse and take longer to recover. People with disabilities have higher rates of death from disasters. This is not because these populations are inherently less able to respond, but because emergency planning and systems may not account for their specific needs. Our Colorado study used interviews and a statewide survey of 222 officials that send alerts to better understand the challenges of providing alerts across the state and reaching at-risk populations.

A patchwork system

The state of Colorado does not have a uniform alert system. Local areas determine the alert systems they will use. Some alerts get sent through systems that require people to opt in. This means that people sign up and choose to receive notifications. Neighboring counties often use different opt-in alert systems, meaning individuals who travel to different counties for work or recreation may need to register for multiple systems. Examples of these systems include Everbridge, used by Boulder County, and CodeRed, used by Adams and Park counties.
A boy stands on top of a car, peering through binoculars, as orange smoke billows in the background.
Amitai Beh, 6, watches the NCAR Fire on March 26, 2022 in Boulder, Colo.. Michael Ciaglo/Stringer via Getty Images
The success of these systems in an emergency relies on the community signing up for alerts. We found that registering for alert systems was a barrier for everyone, but especially those with limited-English proficiency and with disabilities. This is because they may not be aware of the systems that are accessible to them or they are wary of providing personal information, and depending on their location, alerts may only be offered in English.
Most of the Colorado counties either have Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS) approval or are in the process of getting approval. Some counties on the Eastern Plains, like Otero and Kiowa counties, have not started the process.
The current status of Integrated Public Alert and Warning System alerting entities across Colorado. Green means there’s an approved alerting authority, yellow indicates the region is in the process of becoming an alerting authority, and gray means the area has not begun the process. Colorado Division of Homeland Security & Emergency Management, CC BY-ND
Another system is “opt out,” meaning people will receive alerts by default unless they turn them off. These include Wireless Emergency Alerts, or WEAs. These messages get broadcast through cellphone towers to phones in a specific geographic area. So if you have a cellphone in a WEA alert boundary, you will get an alert. WEAs are used in Colorado to target specific regions in danger, such as an area that needs to evacuate or for an Amber Alert. There is no national standard or guidance for opt-in or opt-out systems, which can lead to inconsistencies in how people get alerts.

Lack of resources limits alerting authorities

We found that though authorities often want to provide alerts in other languages and accessible formats, they have significant resource constraints. Time, staff, money or training can all limit the level of accessibility they can provide. Sixty-four percent of the authorities we surveyed said they lacked funding to make alerts more inclusive. More than a third of our respondents didn’t know if their systems could provide alerts in languages other than English or for people with disabilities. This speaks to a need for better training on how these systems work and how to use them effectively. An alert is complete if it includes information about the source, hazard, location and time. Recently, researchers found that fewer than 10% of all Nationwide Wireless Emergency Alerts issued from 2012 to 2022 were complete. One of us – Micki Olson – worked with the federal government to develop the Message Design Dashboard to help alerting authorities craft clear and comprehensive emergency messages. Fifty-six out of 64 counties in Colorado are an Integrated Public Alert and Warning System authority, which means they can send alerts across multiple platforms at once. This can improve alert access since it broadens who alerts reach. Not all counties have this option, and even the ones who do, don’t always use it. In our study, authorities noted limited staff capacity, funds and lack of time prevents them from getting or using the IPAWS system. “We simply do not have the resources, both financial and people, to deploy all of these systems,” a survey respondent from Gunnison County said.

Alert systems were not built to be accessible

The final issue we identified is that alert systems were not developed with accessible options and functionality like video or image options. For example, people who are blind or have low vision won’t have access to a message unless they enable text-speech features on their phone in advance. The WEA system only allows alerts to be sent in English or Spanish. Characters like accents and tildes cannot be included. Expansion of language options was planned but is now on hold for unclear reasons. Some counties have the resources to make alerts available in additional languages, but most do not. Almost 900,000 Coloradans speak a language other than English. According to the Migration Policy Institute, more than 230,000 Coloradans have difficulty comprehending and communicating in English.

Where do we go from here?

Recent events, including the Palisades and Eaton fires in California and the devastating floods in Kerr County, Texas, demonstrate how critical it is that timely and accessible emergency alerts reach everyone, but especially the most vulnerable individuals. However, these systems are complex, and everyone from individuals to local government can play a part in improving them.
  • Federal and local governments can allocate funds to update and standardize systems. They can also implement training and procedures to ensure alerts are effective and inclusive.
  • Authorities that send alerts can partner more closely with trusted community organizations and networks to reach diverse audiences.
  • Researchers can identify how to better tailor systems to meet community needs.
  • Individuals can learn about and sign up for alerts. To do so, visit local government websites or enter “emergency alerts” and the name of your county or city in an online search.
Carson MacPherson-Krutsky, Research Associate, Natural Hazards Center, University of Colorado Boulder; Mary Angelica Painter, Research Associate, Natural Hazards Center, University of Colorado Boulder, and Micki Olson, Senior Researcher in Emergency and Risk Communication, University at Albany, State University of New York This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Author


Discover more from Daily News

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading
Advertisement Tool Tickets
Click to comment
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

STM Blog

Why people trust influencers more than brands – and what that means for the future of marketing

Why people trust influencers? Discover why people trust influencers over traditional brands and what it means for marketing’s future. Learn about parasocial relationships, the 5 types of value influencers provide, and why microinfluencers often outperform mega-creators.

Published

on

Last Updated on December 16, 2025 by Daily News Staff

Why people trust influencers more than brands – and what that means for the future of marketing

Why people trust influencers more than brands – and what that means for the future of marketing

Kelley Cours Anderson, College of Charleston Not long ago, the idea of getting paid to share your morning routine online would have sounded absurd. Yet today, influencers are big business: The global market is expected to surpass US$32 billion by the end of 2025. Rooted in celebrity culture but driven by digital platforms, the influencer economy represents a powerful force in both commerce and culture. I’m an expert on digital consumer research, and I see the rise of influencers as an important evolution in the relationship between companies, consumers and creators. Historically, brands leaned on traditional celebrities like musicians, athletes and actors to endorse their products. However, by the late 2000s, social media platforms opened the door for everyday people to build audiences. Initially, influencers were viewed as a low-cost marketing tactic. Soon, however, they became a central part of marketing strategies. In the 2010s, influencer marketing matured into a global industry. Agencies and digital marketplaces emerged to professionalize influencer-brand matchmaking, and regulators like the Federal Trade Commission started paying more attention to sponsored content. The rise of video and short-form content like TikTok and Reels in the mid-2010s and 2020s added authenticity and emotional immediacy. These dynamics deepened influencer-follower relations in ways that brands couldn’t easily replicate. Influencers are now recognized as not only content creators, but also as entrepreneurs and cultural producers.

Why people trust influencers

Social media influencers often foster what researchers call “parasocial relationships” – one-sided bonds where followers feel as if they personally know the influencer. While the concept has roots in traditional celebrity culture, influencers amplify it through consistent, seemingly authentic content. This perceived intimacy helps explain why consumers often trust influencers more than brands. Though the parasocial relationship isn’t mutual, it feels real. That emotional closeness cultivates trust, a scarce but powerful currency in today’s economy. The goal for many influencers may be financial independence, but the path begins with social and cultural capital, acquired through community connection, relatability and niche expertise. As an influencer’s following grows, so does their perceived legitimacy. Brands, in turn, recognize and tap into that legitimacy. Although risks exist, like algorithmic incentives and commercial partnerships that undercut authenticity, many influencers successfully navigate this tension to preserve their community’s trust.

The many ways creators add value

Like any economy, the influencer economy revolves around value exchange. Followers spend their valuable resources – time and attention – in return for something meaningful. Researchers have identified several forms of value that influencers’ content can take:
  • Connection, or what researchers call “social value”: Influencers often build tight-knit communities around shared interests. Through live chats, comments and relatable storytelling, they offer a sense of belonging.
  • Fun, or “hedonic value”: Many influencers provide enjoyment using entertainment, humor and a touch of allure in their content. Think cat videos, TikTok dances and random acts of kindness that deliver joy and distraction from the day-to-day.
  • Knowledge, or “epistemic value”: Creators offer informational or educational content to feed consumer curiosity. This can be through tutorials, product reviews or deep dives into niche topics.
  • Usefulness, or “utilitarian value”: From life hacks to product roundups, like “Amazon must-haves,” influencers provide utilitarian or practical value to help simplify consumer decisions and solve everyday problems.
  • Money, or “financial value”: People love finding a bargain. Discounts, affiliate links and deal alerts offer direct economic benefit to followers. Some influencers even launch their own products or digital courses, delivering long-term value through entrepreneurial spinoffs.
These forms of value often overlap, reinforcing trust, and can pay off financially for influencers. In fact, consumers are significantly more likely to trust user-generated content like influencer posts over brand-generated advertising.

Lessons for brands

First, there’s evidence that smaller is often stronger. Marketing researchers categorize influencers based on how many followers they have, and nano- and microinfluencers – defined as those with fewer than 10,000 and 100,000 followers, respectively – often generate stronger engagement than mega-influencers with more than 1 million. Influencers with smaller followings can interact with their communities more closely, making their endorsements feel more credible. This has driven brands to focus on mid-tier and microinfluencers, where return on investment is often stronger. As a result, influencer agencies, brokers, platforms and trade associations have sprung up to facilitate these partnerships. Second, brands should remember that influencers’ role in the market comes with new challenges. As the field continues to become more professionalized, it’s also become more complex. Like other entrepreneurs, influencers must keep up with shifting regulations – namely, FTC sponsorship guidelines – which can lead to hefty fines if violated. Many struggle to identify how to best file their taxes when they receive freebies they are expected to build content around. It can also be a challenge for influencers to keep up with continued algorithm tweaks from the multiple social media platforms where they publish. Influencers manage more than content creation. Their role includes quickly responding to followers’ comments and managing communities, as well as handling trolls, all of which is stressful. Personal brand management adds another layer of pressure. As influencers gain more brand partnerships, they run the risk of being seen as “selling out.” Because parasocial trust depends on being viewed as authentic, aligning with the wrong brand or being too promotional can damage the very connection that built an influencer’s following. A single misstep can trigger public backlash. While growing a following can bring brand recognition and financial independence, some influencers even fear that they will lose their own identity. Influencers can struggle with work-life balance, as this is not a nine-to-five job. It requires being “always on” and the constant blurred lines. Their lives become their livelihoods, with little separation between personal and professional identity. In short, when engaging with influencers, strategic brands will recognize that they operate within an intense, high-pressure environment. Organizations such as the American Influencer Council offer support and advocacy, but industry-wide protections are lacking. Influencers have earned a central place in consumer culture not just by selling products, but by offering emotional proximity, cultural relevance and value. They’re not just marketers – they’re creators, community leaders and entrepreneurs. As the creator economy continues to grow, trust will remain its cornerstone. However, the next chapter will require thoughtful navigation of issues like regulation, platform ethics and creator well-being. Understanding influencers means recognizing both their creative work and the evolving market that now depends on them. Kelley Cours Anderson, Assistant Professor of Marketing, College of Charleston This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Dive into “The Knowledge,” where curiosity meets clarity. This playlist, in collaboration with STMDailyNews.com, is designed for viewers who value historical accuracy and insightful learning. Our short videos, ranging from 30 seconds to a minute and a half, make complex subjects easy to grasp in no time. Covering everything from historical events to contemporary processes and entertainment, “The Knowledge” bridges the past with the present. In a world where information is abundant yet often misused, our series aims to guide you through the noise, preserving vital knowledge and truths that shape our lives today. Perfect for curious minds eager to discover the ‘why’ and ‘how’ of everything around us. Subscribe and join in as we explore the facts that matter.  https://stmdailynews.com/the-knowledge/


Discover more from Daily News

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Hollywood vs. Reality: How LA’s Wilshire Subway Was Really Built

Wilshire Subway: Did LA blast subway tunnels under Wilshire Boulevard? Hollywood says yes — engineers say no. Here’s how Metro safely tunneled beneath Miracle Mile.

Published

on

envato labs image edit

When the 1997 disaster film Volcano depicted lava erupting along Wilshire Boulevard and referenced blasting during Red Line subway construction, it delivered gripping cinema — but not accurate engineering.

In reality, Los Angeles Metro did not rely on large-scale blasting to construct subway tunnels beneath Wilshire Boulevard and the Miracle Mile. Instead, engineers used tunnel boring machines (TBMs) specifically to avoid the very risks Hollywood dramatized.

Why Blasting Was Avoided

The Wilshire Corridor sits atop historic oil fields, making methane gas pockets a known and serious concern. A deadly methane explosion near Fairfax Avenue in 1985 led to heightened scrutiny of underground construction in the area. Blasting in such conditions could have caused unpredictable gas releases, ground instability, or damage to surface structures.

As a result, Metro engineers chose pressurized, closed-face tunnel boring machines, which allow for:

  • Controlled excavation in dense urban environments

  • Continuous ground support to prevent settlement

  • Integrated gas detection and ventilation systems

These machines grind slowly through soil and rock while installing precast concrete tunnel linings, creating a sealed, gas-resistant structure as they advance. envato labs image edit

The Real Engineering Feat

Although Volcano took creative liberties for dramatic effect, the true story of tunneling under Wilshire is no less impressive. Advances in TBM technology and methane mitigation ultimately allowed the Metro D Line (formerly the Red Line/Purple Line) to safely pass through one of Los Angeles’ most geologically complex corridors — without explosions, collapsing streets, or cinematic chaos.

Bottom Line

Volcano remains a memorable piece of 1990s disaster cinema, but its portrayal of subway construction is fiction. The real achievement lies in decades of careful planning, modern tunneling technology, and engineering solutions that quietly reshaped Los Angeles beneath its busiest boulevard.

Related Links:

Dreambreaker: A Pickleball Story — A Closer Look at the Documentary and Its Uncredited Voice
Link: https://stmdailynews.com/dreambreaker-a-pickleball-story-a-closer-look-at-the-documentary-and-its-uncredited-voice/

Discover more from Daily News

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Blog

Glad and Oscar the Grouch Team Up for a Trashy, Toe-Tapping Campaign

Glad teams up with Oscar the Grouch for a playful revival of the “Don’t Get Mad. Get Glad.” campaign, featuring a musical number, limited-edition Oscar-inspired trash bags, and a fresh take on making trash day fun for all ages.

Published

on

Oscar the Grouch and Glad trash bags featured in a colorful musical campaign, celebrating their playful collaboration with limited-edition green Oscar-inspired totes.

Glad revives its most popular, decades-long, star-studded ad campaign, “Don’t Get Mad. Get Glad.”

What happens when the world’s most iconic grouch meets the nation’s go-to name in trash bags? You get a campaign that’s equal parts nostalgia, Broadway-style fun, and a reminder that even trash can bring a little joy to your day.

A Classic Campaign Gets a Grouchy Remix

Glad has officially revived its legendary “Don’t Get Mad. Get Glad.” campaign, but this time, they’re ditching the usual celebrity faces for a true original: Oscar the Grouch. For the first time, the campaign’s star is none other than Sesame Street’s resident trash enthusiast himself, and he’s bringing his signature tune “I Love Trash” back with a contemporary twist.
The musical number, directed by the award-winning duo Will Speck and Josh Gordon, opens with Oscar in his element—surrounded by trash and a little bit of grumpiness. But the real magic happens when Oscar imagines a world where everyone else shares his passion for trash. The result? A joyful, Broadway-inspired remix that transforms everyday frustration into a celebration of Glad’s dependable trash solutions.

Why Oscar? Why Now?

According to Glad’s Marketing Director, Kellie Li, the choice was simple: “No one feels more strongly about trash than Oscar the Grouch.” The campaign aims to flip the script on how we think about trash—turning a dreaded chore into something a little more lighthearted. With Glad’s reliable bags, there’s less to get mad about, and maybe, just maybe, a little more to sing about.

Nostalgia Meets New Audiences

If “Don’t Get Mad. Get Glad.” sounds familiar, you’re not imagining things. The campaign has been a staple since 1987, featuring everyone from TV stars to athletes. But this new chapter, featuring Oscar and a cast of trash-loving co-stars, is designed to connect with both longtime fans and a new generation discovering Sesame Street on Netflix and PBS KIDS.

Limited-Edition Oscar Goodies and Where to Find Them

To celebrate the campaign, Glad is releasing limited-edition Oscar-inspired trash bag totes—complete with green fur, of course. Fans can snag these playful bags through a social media giveaway this December (follow @gladproducts on Instagram and TikTok for details). And if you miss out, don’t worry: special Oscar-branded Glad ForceFlex with Gain bags will hit Walmart shelves this April, just in time for spring cleaning.

Where to Watch

The campaign is rolling out across the U.S. and Canada, with full-length videos, bite-sized social teasers, and everything in between. Look for it on TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, and Reddit (for our friends up north). Featured products include Glad ForceFlex with Gain and Glad Cherry Blossom.

Bringing the Campaign Home: Phoenix Community Clean-Up

Here in Phoenix, we know the value of coming together to keep our neighborhoods clean and vibrant. Glad’s collaboration with Oscar the Grouch isn’t just a fun national campaign—it’s a reminder that tackling trash can be a community effort, too.
With spring cleaning right around the corner and special Oscar-branded Glad bags hitting Walmart shelves this April, it’s the perfect time for local groups, schools, and neighbors to organize clean-up events across the Valley. Whether you’re sprucing up a park, refreshing a neighborhood, or just making your own block a little brighter, every bag makes a difference.
Ready to join the movement? Rally your friends, family, or local organization and plan a Phoenix clean-up day this spring. Snap a photo of your crew with your Glad or Oscar-inspired trash bags and share it on social media using #GladToCleanPHX and #OscarLovesTrash. Let’s show how Phoenix turns trash day into a reason to celebrate!
  • “Phoenix, let’s get grouchy about litter and Glad about clean streets! Join our community clean-up and share your photos with #GladToCleanPHX.”
  • “Spotted: Oscar the Grouch in Phoenix! Grab your Glad bags, clean up your neighborhood, and tag #OscarLovesTrash for a chance to be featured.”
  • “Spring cleaning in Phoenix just got a lot more fun—thanks to Glad and Oscar! Who’s joining our next clean-up day? #GladToCleanPHX”

About the Brands

Glad, a member of The Clorox Company, has long been a leader in household waste solutions, while Sesame Workshop continues to inspire and educate families worldwide. This collaboration is a perfect blend of dependable products and beloved characters—reminding us all that even the messiest moments can spark a little joy.
The collaboration between Glad and Sesame Workshop for the “Don’t Get Mad. Get Glad.” campaign marks a creative partnership that blends household dependability with beloved children’s entertainment. By bringing Oscar the Grouch into the spotlight, Glad not only revives a classic campaign but also highlights the importance of making everyday chores more enjoyable for families. This partnership leverages Glad’s reputation as the nation’s leading provider of kitchen and outdoor trash bags and food protection products—trusted solutions designed to handle life’s messes with ease (Glad.com). Sesame Workshop, the nonprofit behind Sesame Street, has spent over 50 years enriching families worldwide through educational media and community outreach, helping children grow smarter, stronger, and kinder (Sesame.org). Together, their collaboration aims to inspire a new generation to see the positive side of cleaning up, all while celebrating the joy of community and play.
Sources:
High Demand Marks “Veggies for Veterans” Event Amid SNAP Delays

Discover more from Daily News

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Trending

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x